Tripura Violence: SC Agrees to Hear Plea by Journalist, Others Booked Under UAPA


Supreme Court. 

The petitioners moved the Supreme Court seeking to quash the FIR registered against them and challenged the constitutional validity of certain widely misused provisions of UAPA and the wide definition of ‘unlawful activities’

NEW DELHI — The Supreme Court on Thursday agreed to hear a plea challenging the Tripura Police’s decision to invoke the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) against several lawyers, activists and journalist Shyam Meera Singh.

Initially, a bench headed by Chief Justice N.V. Ramana asked advocate Prashant Bhushan, representing the petitioners, to move the concerned high court in the matter, but later agreed to it.

Bhushan submitted before the bench also comprising Justices A. S. Bopanna and Hima Kohli that the petitioners are also challenging the constitutional validity of certain widely misused provisions of UAPA and the wide definition of ‘unlawful activities’.

The petitioners said the present petition is being filed under Article 32 of the Constitution in relation to the targeted political violence against the Muslim minorities in Tripura during the second half of the month of October, 2021.

“The subsequent efforts by the State of Tripura to monopolise the flow of information and facts emanating from the affected areas by invoking provisions of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, (hereinafter, UAPA) against members of civil society including advocates and journalists who have made the effort to bring facts in relation to the targeted violence in the public domain”, said the plea.

Recently, the Tripura Police had booked a journalist and other activists for offences punishable under the UAPA. The petitioners — Mukesh, Ansarul Haq Ansari, and Shyam Meera Singh — moved the Supreme Court seeking to quash the first information report (FIR) registered against them.

According to the petition, the fact-finding report titled as “Humanity Under Attack in Tripura #Muslim Lives Matter”, published on November 2, by Lawyers for Democracy, on the findings of a four-member fact-finding team comprising advocate Ehtesham Hashmi (Supreme Court), advocate Amit Srivastav (member, coordination committee, Lawyers for Democracy), advocate Ansar Indori (National Secretary, NCHRO), & advocate Mukesh (Member, PUCL Delhi) has brought on record evidences into the orchestrated and targeted violence perpetrated by political right wing forces on the minority Muslim community in Tripura in October — purportedly as a counterblast to violence perpetrated on minority Hindu community in Bangladesh, which continued until October 26. — IANS

Clarion India - News, Views and Insights about Indian Muslims, Dalits, Minorities, Women and Other Marginalised and Dispossessed Communities.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:




More like this

MP Congress to Move HC over Scam in ‘Mahakal Lok’ Corridor

BHOPAL - The Congress on Wednesday said it will...

Congress Chief Kharge, Venugopal to Attend Oppn Meeting in Patna

NEW DELHI - As the proposed meeting of non-NDA opposition...

No Cause to Cheer in the GDP Numbers, Says Congress

NEW DELHI - The Congress on Wednesday hit back at...

Muslim Body in Meghalaya Seeks 4% Job Quota

SHILLONG - A local organisation in Meghalaya has demanded 4...