IO Manipulated Evidence, Says Court as 3 Muslims Discharged in Delhi Riots Case

Date:

While discharging the accused namely Akil Ahmad, Rahish Khan and Irshad, the Additional Sessions Judge, Pulastya Pramachala of Karkardooma Courts expressed suspicion over the conduct of the investigating officer (IO) from the Delhi Police.

NEW DELHI — In the 2020 Delhi riots case, a court in the national capital has discharged three individuals who were accused of rioting, being part of an unlawful assembly and committing vandalism during the riots.

The Additional Sessions Judge, Pulastya Pramachala of Karkardooma Courts, while discharging the accused namely Akil Ahmad, Rahish Khan and Irshad, expressed suspicion over the conduct of the investigating officer (IO) from the Delhi Police.

The judge stated that there were indications of the IO manipulating evidence and filing chargesheets in a pre-determined and mechanical manner.

The court said that the reported incidents were not thoroughly and properly investigated, and charge sheets seemed to have been filed with an agenda to conceal the initial lapses.

The judge then referred the matter back to the Delhi Police, urging them to re-evaluate the investigation and take appropriate legal actions.

The case, registered as FIR 71/2020, originated from a rukka prepared by an Assistant Sub-Inspector (ASI) on February 28, 2020.

Subsequent to the initial filing, the IO combined several complaints into the case, leading to the charge sheet against the accused on July 14, 2020.

Additional supplementary charge sheets were filed on February 15, 2022, and February 16 of the following year.

The court raised concerns about inconsistencies in the charge sheets, including the naming of individuals not mentioned in the statements.

It also questioned the timeline and continuity of events, highlighting discrepancies between different complainants’ accounts and the actual observations made by ASI Surender Pal.

The court concluded that subsequent statements were seemingly manufactured to cover up inadequacies in the prosecution’s case and to validate the accused’s chargesheeting.

It noted a lack of evidence supporting the accuracy of these subsequent statements.

Hence, the judge decided to discharge the accused persons and called for a re-evaluation of the investigation process to ensure a fair and just resolution to the case. — IANS

Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

Don’t Take Inflation Lightly, Former Finance Minister Chidambaram Cautions Government

Is inflation such a trivial subject (that) you can...

How Does Kamala Harris View the Middle East?

Every word Vice President says about the Middle East...

MP: Hindutva Groups Create Ruckus at Guna School over English-Speaking Rule

FIR filed against principal even after she offered apologies Team...

The World Court Has Just Cleared the Fog Hiding Western Support for Israel’s Crimes

The legal ruling by the world's highest court obliges...