The organisation submits responses to the JPC on the Waqf Amendment Bill, raising concerns over proposed changes
Team Clarion
NEW DELHI — Jamaat-e-Islami Hind has officially submitted comprehensive written responses to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) addressing questions regarding the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024. The organisation expressed significant concerns over the bill’s implications for the sanctity and functionality of the Waqf system, calling for a reconsideration of the proposed amendments.
Deputy Ameer of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind, Malik Motasim Khan, disclosed that the responses were formulated after a detailed meeting with the JPC held last November. “The Waqf (Amendment) Bill undermines the sanctity and powers of Waqf institutions, which are crucial for the social, economic, and religious progress of Muslims,” he stated in a press release.
The JPC presented Jamaat-e-Islami Hind with a comprehensive questionnaire comprising 65 questions, delving into the constitutional, administrative, and legal aspects of Waqf. The queries explored various critical issues, including the religious and secular roles of Waqf properties, and whether the benefits of these properties extend beyond Muslims to other sections of society. The questionnaire also addressed the legal and administrative complexities surrounding Waqf properties, instances of illegal encroachments, and the responsibilities of Waqf Boards. Additionally, the JPC sought perspectives on the inclusion of non-Muslims in Waqf Boards and measures to enhance transparency and accountability. The historical and religious significance of Waqf was also a key area of inquiry, underscoring the broader context of the discussion.
In its response, the Jamaat underscored the community’s apprehensions about the bill’s potential to diminish the autonomy and scope of Waqf arrangements.
The Jamaat argued that the bill, in its current form, poses a threat to longstanding Waqf institutions such as mosques, graveyards, and dargahs, especially those lacking formal documentation despite their centuries-old public service.
“The provision allowing District Collectors to determine the status of Waqfs could lead to conflicts of interest, as government departments are often the ones encroaching on Waqf lands,” explained Malik Motasim Khan. He warned that these amendments might open the door to ownership disputes and legal chaos.
The Waqf (Amendment) Bill has faced strong protests from the Muslim community, with many viewing it as an attempt to weaken the religious and cultural heritage of Waqf properties. Critics argue that empowering District Collectors over Waqf matters could exacerbate issues of illegal encroachments by government agencies themselves.
Addressing concerns about transparency, the Jamaat highlighted the need for reforms within the Waqf Boards to ensure better accountability while maintaining the community’s control over its assets.
Malik Motasim Khan appealed for the preservation of historical Waqfs, emphasising their critical role in the welfare and development of the Muslim community. “The strength of the Waqf system is integral to our community’s social and religious fabric. Any dilution of its powers would be a step backwards,” he remarked.
The Jamaat’s response to the JPC also addressed the broader social implications of the bill, reiterating the necessity of safeguarding Waqf properties for the benefit of all.
The JPC is expected to review the submitted responses and provide recommendations. Meanwhile, protests against the proposed amendments continue, with community leaders urging the government to prioritise dialogue and consensus.
