The RSS maintains that it is just a group of individuals. Fair enough, but how about it receiving massive funds?
FOR varied reasons, Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) are in the spotlight these days.
In his Independence Day speech last year, Prime Minister and RSS Pracharak, Narendra Modi, described the Hindutva organisation as the biggest NGO in the world.
“Today, I would like to proudly mention that 100 years ago, an organisation was born — Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). 100 years of service to the nation is a proud, golden chapter… In a way, RSS is the biggest NGO in the world. It has a history of 100 years of dedication”.
Incidentally, there is another aspect to this NGO; it is a non-registered organisation, which is supposed to be engaged in cultural work. On this count, Priyank Kharge, Home Minister of Karnataka, called for the registration of the RSS. The Hindutva organisation maintains that it is just a group of individuals. Fair enough, but how about it receiving massive funds?
At another level, recently in the parliament, the Ministry of Home has promulgated a new Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA), which seeks to restrict the activities of NGOs receiving foreign funds. The basic surmise and propaganda of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is that forcible conversions are being done, particularly by Christian NGOs. As per its understanding, the conversion to Christianity is forcible, and the Christian missionaries’ running of education and health facilities is an allurement to convert the people. How much of this is true? While we have Article 25 in our Constitution, which guarantees the citizens the fundamental right to freely practice, profess, and propagate their religion.
Those in power assert that this article gives us the right to practice, preach and propagate our religion, but it does not give the right to convert someone. The understanding of Hindu nationalists is that the efforts of missionaries are due to allurement or force. It seems there are no ground-level studies to tell us how many of those studying in Christian mission schools convert to that religion. There is also no data on how many of the Dalits/Adivasis convert to Christianity because of allurement or force.
Christianity in India is a very old religion. It came here with the arrival of St. Thomas, according to one version, in AD 52. He started building churches and many of the locals were enamoured by his religion. A look at the statistics will tell us that the trajectory of growth of this religion in India has been a slow one. As per the last available census data (2011) it was 2.30% of the population. On top of that, during the period when lots of noises are made about forcible conversion, the population census data tell another story. The Christian population stands at 1971-2.60%, 1981-2.44%, 1991-2.34%. 2001-2.30% and 201- 2.30 %.
Despite this data, the propaganda about forcible conversion and also conversion through allurement has been intense, leading to horrific violence. The most ghastly of this violence took place in Keonjhar, Manoharpur, Odisha, in 1999, when Pastor Graham Steward Stains was burnt alive. The main instigator of this violence was Dara Singh aka Rajendra Singh Pal of Bajrang Dal, who is undergoing life imprisonment. This horrific murder was called by the then President of India K R Narayanan as a barbaric act that belonged “…to the world’s inventory of black deeds.” Wadhva Commission was appointed in the wake of this tragedy. The commission stated that “the Pastor had not been doing the work of conversion; he was involved in serving leprosy patients”.
What is remarkable is that as per the report, there was no substantial increase in the percentage of the Christian population in the area. The report states, “Keonjhar district had a total population of 15.30 lakh. Out of them, 14.93 lakh were Hindus. Christians, mostly tribals, were 4,707. According to the 1991 census, there were already 4,112 Christians in the district. Thus, there was an increase of only 595 in the Christian population.” This increase is not statistically significant.
Then we witnessed intense activities in Dangs (Gujarat) and Kandhamal (Odisha) , many from VHP, Swami Aseemanand, Swami Laxmananand had set up their ashrams in these areas. These areas also witnessed intense violence, culminating in the tragic Kandhamal Violence of 2008. Now as an offshoot of this propaganda, Christian pastors working in remote areas are facing scattered subradar violence. Their prayer meetings are labelled as the ones for conversion work and attacked.
One of the major ideologues of BJP/RSS, Ram Madhav in his article supporting the new FCRA modifications, reminds that the Niyogi Committee had already opined restrictions of missionaries, but the Jawaharlal Nehru government decided not to implement its recommendations. Further, Madhav says that it is Modi now who is implementing those recommendations. (The Indian Express June 27, 2026)
The Niyogi Committee Report on Christian Missionary Activities (1956) investigated controversial religious proselytisation in India. It concluded that conversions were largely driven by inducements like education and medical care, warning that foreign missionary networks sought to create a separate Christian state within India.
Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru’s government effectively rejected the Niyogi Committee Report because its proposed restrictions conflicted with the newly formed Constitution, particularly the fundamental rights to propagate religion. Nehru viewed the report’s recommendations as a threat to religious freedom.
Madhav points out that Gandhi was against proselytisation. It is true; but he was not against freedom of religion. Now, freedom of religion is primarily presented and propagated as proselytisation. What Gandhi said was not against the practice of religion in any way. In an interview dated 22nd March 1931 to The Hindu, Gandhi apparently stated that if in a self-governing India, missionaries kept “proselytising by means of medical aid, education etc., I would certainly ask them to withdraw. Every nation’s religion is as good as any other. Certainly, India’s religions are adequate for her people. We need no converting spirituality.” This is the first part of the quote and the lines that follow give the totally opposite idea — the ideas which Gandhi held. Gandhi goes on to write: “This is what the reporter has put in my mouth… All that I can say is that it is a travesty of what I have always said and held.”
He goes on to explain: “I am, then, not against conversion… Every nation considers its own faith to be as good as that of any other. Certainly, the great faiths held by the people of India are adequate for her people… And then he goes on to list the faiths of India: ‘Apart from Christianity and Judaism, Hinduism and its offshoots, Islam and Zoroastrianism are living faiths.’ (Gandhi’s Collected Works, Volume XLVI p. 27-28)
For the ilk of Madhav, Christianity is a foreign religion spread by force and allurement. Their basic understanding of the issue, to say the least, is flawed.
Ram Puniyani is an eminent author, activist and former professor of IIT Mumbai. The views expressed here are the author’s personal and Clarion India does not necessarily share or subscribe to them.
