SC Constitution Bench Reserves Verdict in Pleas Challenging Abrogation of Article 370

Date:

NEW DELHI — A 5-judge Constitution Bench, headed by CJI D.Y. Chandrachud, on Tuesday reserved its judgment in the batch of petitions challenging the 2019 Presidential Order taking away the special status accorded to the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir and its bifurcation into two Union Territories.

“We must end it with a vote of thanks to all the members of the bar. Thank you very much,” said the bench, also comprising Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, B.R. Gavai, and Surya Kant.

The Constitution Bench, which included the five senior most judges of the Supreme Court, commenced hearing the matter from August 2.

It will deliver its judgment soon after it has reserved the verdict on hearing oral arguments from both sides.

In March 2020, a five-judge Constitution Bench declined to accept the contentions of the petitioners to refer the issue to a larger bench of seven judges.

The five-judge Constitution Bench, headed by then CJI N.V. Ramana, reasoned that the earlier judgments rendered by the top court in the Prem Nath Kaul case and the Sampat Prakash case, dealing with the interpretation of Article 370, were not in conflict with each other.

CJI Chandrachud and Justice Khanna are the new members of the latest bench as Chief Justice Ramana and Justice Subhash Reddy, who were part of the earlier bench, had retired. — IANS

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

‘Corporate Jihad’ Charge Shifts Focus to Muslim Employees at Wipro in Pune

A former female employee claims a colleague asked her...

Ex-Israeli Premier Warns Netanyahu Could Try to ‘Steal’ Next Elections

‘The prime minister and the gang of thugs governing...

Failure of Triple Engine Govt: Cong Criticises BJP Over Malviya Nagar Fire Tragedy

Congress MP Manoj Kumar questioned who will be held...