Claiming Attack on Narsinghanand’s Temple, BJP MLA Calls for ‘Encounter’

Date:

The legislator’s comments came close on the heels of the registration of several FIRs against Yati Narsinghanand for objectionable remarks against Islam and the Prophet

Team Clarion

NEW DELHI – Further fuelling the controversy generated by the outrageous remarks of Hindutva proponent Yati Narsinghanand against Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), BJP MLA Nand Kishor Gurjar (Loni) on Saturday alleged that Narsinghanand’s temple in Uttar Pradesh’s Dasna was attacked on Friday and that those responsible should be “shot in an encounter”.

The legislator’s comments came close on the heels of the registration of several FIRs against Narsinghanand for objectionable remarks against Islam and the Prophet. The controversial head priest of the Dasna Devi temple in Ghaziabad is learned to have been detained by the Uttar Pradesh Police on Saturday. 

Police have not confirmed any attack on the temple. “A few youths were creating a ruckus outside the temple premises on Friday night. The temple organisation informed the local SHO and the situation was brought under control,” said Surendra Nath Tiwari, Deputy Commissioner of Police (Rural), Ghaziabad.

Gurjar, who visited the Dasna Devi temple on Saturday, said: “Police ne raat lathi-charge karne ka toh natak kiya, lekin raat 10-20 logon ko goli maar kar encounter karna chahiye tha… Yeh humla puri Hindutva pe hai… Agar raat 10-20 log mar jaate toh is tarah bawal karne wale nahi hote (Police put up a performance of doing a lathi charge at night, but should have shot 10-20 people in an encounter at night… This is an attack on Hindutva… If 10-20 people had been killed, there wouldn’t have been a ruckus like this),” a report in The Indian Express quoted the legislator as saying.

“Yahan kanoon se chalega desh. Yeh koi Syria nahin hai, Afghanistan, Bangladesh nahin hai. Yahan ki police mazboot hai, mujhe umeed hai ki police yahan nyay karegi. Mahantji ne jo kaha uspe FIR hogi, uske baad yeh humla… yeh humla mandir pe kiya gaya hai… is liye jinhone humla kiya hai unki saat peedi yaad karengi aisa hum kardenge, ya police karyawahi kare… yeh danga hi hua tha raat ko… kya choodiyan pehen ke baithe hain log (This country is ruled by law. This is not Syria, Afghanistan or Bangladesh. The police are strong here, I hope they do justice. There will be an FIR on what Mahantji said, yet there was an attack… this was an attack on a temple… so we will ensure that seven generations of those behind the attack will remember it, or the police should take action… there was a riot at night… are people wearing bangles),” he was quoted as saying.

MLA Gurjar’s remarks came even as Narsinghanand’s latest blasphemous statement made in Ghaziabad on September 29 – purported video clips are being circulated on social media — triggered protests and police complaints in several states besides Uttar Pradesh, including Maharashtra and Telangana, and the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir.

Earlier too, Narsinghanand was arrested for his “hate speech” at a ‘Dharam Sansad’ in Haridwar in December 2021. While on bail in the case, he had again made similar comments at a ‘Mahapanchayat’ in Delhi in April 2022.

Following his latest remarks, the UP police have registered an FIR against him under BNS Sections 299 (deliberate and malicious acts, intended to outrage religious feelings), 302 (intentionally hurting religious sentiments), and 197 (actions that harm national integration).

Meanwhile, security has been stepped up at the Dasna Devi temple after the protests on Friday. An FIR was registered on Saturday against 100-150 unidentified people under various BNS Sections including 298 (injuring or defiling a place of worship with intent to insult religion), 353 (statements conducing to public mischief), 191(2) (rioting), 193(3) (liability of owner of land on which an unlawful assembly or riot takes place), 132 (assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty), 121(1) (voluntarily causing hurt or grievous hurt to deter public servant from his duty) and 221 (obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions).

As protests against Narsinghanand continued in different parts of the country, an FIR was registered against four more persons — identified as Anil Yadav, Rann Sighnanand, Ram Swaroopanand and Nirbhayanand, all temple priests — in connection with the hate speech, under BNS Sections 302 (intentionally hurting religious sentiments) and 351(2) (criminal intimidation).

Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

Himachal: Hearing in Sanjauli Mosque Case Deferred as Locals File Plea for Making Them Party

Clarion India SHIMLA - A local court on Monday deferred the...

SC Refuses to Entertain bail Plea of Activist Gulfisha Fatima in Delhi Riots Case

Clarion India NEW DELHI - The Supreme Court on Monday refused...

BJP Tries to Divide Us along Hindu-Muslim Lines, While Accuses Other Parties: Kharge

PALAMU - In a fiery election speech in...