Anti-CAA Protests: HC Notice to Delhi Police on Sharjeel Imam’s Bail Plea

Date:

Imam had approached the high court first for relief following the historic Supreme Court verdict that put on hold the colonial-era penal provision of sedition (Section 124-A of the Indian Penal Code).

NEW DELHI — The Delhi High Court on Friday sought the response of the Delhi Police on activist Sharjeel Imam’s appeal against a lower court order denying him interim bail in a sedition case.

The sedition case is related to the alleged inflammatory speeches delivered by Imam at the Aligarh Muslim University and the Jamia Milia Islamia during the anti-CAA protests in 2019-20.

Issuing notice to the Delhi Police, a Division Bench of Justices Mukta Gupta and Anish Dayal, posted the further hearing on August 25.

The bench also sought a status report from the police within two weeks.

On July 23, Additional sessions judge Amitabh Rawat of Karkardooma court dismissed the interim bail plea of Imam, who is in judicial custody under sedition charges, among others.

The former JNU student was approaching the lower court after withdrawing the interim bail application from the Delhi High Court as the prosecution had raised the issue of maintainability.

Imam had approached the high court first for relief following the historic Supreme Court verdict that put on hold the colonial-era penal provision of sedition (Section 124-A of the Indian Penal Code).

In his bail application, Imam said that since the top court has put sedition in abeyance, his case has improved for the grant of bail.

“The appellant has been incarcerated for nearly 28 months since January 28, 2020 whereas the maximum punishment for the offences — not including 124-A IPC — are punishable for up to a maximum of seven years imprisonment,” the plea read.

JNU scholars and activists Imam and Umar Khalid are among the nearly dozen people allegedly involved in the alleged larger conspiracy linked to the Delhi riots of 2020, as per the Delhi Police.

Imam and Khalid are facing charges in connection with making inflammatory speeches which allegedly fuelled the violence, as per the police.

The riots broke out in the national capital in February 2020 as clashes between the anti-CAA (Citizenship Amendment Act) and pro-CAA protesters took a violent turn.

The mayhem saw more than 50 people lose their lives besides leaving over 700 persons injured. — IANS

Sharjeel Imam. A Division Bench of Justices Mukta Gupta and Anish Dayal, posted the further hearing on August 25.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

spot_imgspot_img

Popular

More like this
Related

Preempting a Generative AI Monopoly

Diane Coyle CAMBRIDGE – ChatGPT, the new artificial-intelligence chatbot developed...

Amid Demand for JPC on Adani, Manish Tewari Moves Adjournment Notice on China

NEW DELHI -- Amid Adani row and the demand for...

SC Issues Notice to Centre on Pleas Against Blocking of BBC Documentary on Gujarat Riots

The apex court was hearing a petition filed by...

SFI to Screen BBC Documentary on Modi in Two Kolkata Education Institutes

Earlier, the SFI units of Calcutta Medical College &...