Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav’s speech at a VHP event drew criticism nationwide. The Supreme Court took note, but the impeachment process has remained stalled for over a year
PRAYAGRAJ — The retirement of Allahabad High Court judge Shekhar Kumar Yadav has once again brought attention to a long-standing controversy over his abusive remarks about Muslims, with questions being raised over accountability and delay in action.
Justice Yadav retired on Wednesday after completing his tenure. However, the issue surrounding his objectionable statements during a public event continues to remain unresolved.
The controversy dates back to December 8, 2024, when Justice Yadav attended a programme organised by the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) in Prayagraj. The event, held at the High Court library building, included discussions on the Waqf Board law, religious conversion and the Uniform Civil Code.
During his speech, Justice Yadav spoke in favour of the Uniform Civil Code, stating that it would bring equality and uniformity in laws across different religions. He said, “Uniform Civil Code is based on equality and justice and aims to remove separate legal systems based on religion.”
However, several of his remarks about Muslims during the same speech triggered widespread criticism. He made comments on practices such as multiple marriages, triple talaq and halala, and used words that were seen as offensive by many in the Muslim community. Critics said such statements from a sitting judge raised serious concerns about impartiality.
The matter gained national attention after the Supreme Court took note of the issue. Following this, an impeachment motion was also introduced against him in Parliament. Despite this, the process remained pending for over a year.
Legal observers and members of civil society have expressed concern over the delay. A senior advocate, requesting anonymity, said, “When a judge makes remarks targeting a community, it affects public trust in the justice system. Delay in action only deepens that concern.”
Members of the Muslim community also voiced disappointment. One community representative said, “We expect fairness from judges. Statements like these hurt sentiments and create fear among minorities.”
Justice Yadav was appointed as an additional judge in 2019 and became a permanent judge in 2021. Despite the controversy, he was given a formal farewell by the full court on his retirement.
The case has raised wider questions about judicial responsibility and the need for timely action in matters involving members of the judiciary. For many, the lack of progress on the impeachment motion continues to be a matter of concern, even after his retirement.
