While issues of human rights violations and humanitarian suffering elsewhere in the country are promptly and enthusiastically reported and played out a zillion times in 24/7 media, they are swallowed up by a cold silence of indifference and apathy when similar things happen in Kashmir. Worse still, they are portrayed as a grand Pakistan plot to sow seeds of strife in Kashmir and tear it away from the unwilling hands of mother India. If only Indian journalists were able to see Kashmir not as a territory with a predominantly Muslim majority claimed and obsessed over by Pakistan but as people of flesh and blood like us, would we still be so indifferent and insensitive to their predicament and appalling humanitarian tragedy that is Kashmir?
AIJAZ ZAKA SYED | Caravan Daily
[dropcap]I[/dropcap]ndian media boasts an illustrious history. Born under the British rule, it quickly mastered the rules of the game, working around the stiff curbs and acute sensitivities of colonial masters.
If the Independence movement saw popular newspapers provide intellectual leadership and direction to the country, the post-independence era saw them really thrive, mirroring the aspirations and dreams of a young nation.
Except for the dark interregnum of Indira Gandhi’s Emergency when in the words of Advani it chose to crawl when told to bend, the Indian media has been fiercely independent. Never shying away from speaking truth to power, it has jealously guarded its independence under successive governments.
My former paper Indian Express has by far been the most fearless of them all, perpetually defying the government of the day with its brilliant reportage, incisive commentary and historic investigative stories. Bringing down governments with some of its exposes, the Express defiantly printed blank sheets in place of the editorial when told to submit it to government scrutiny during the Emergency!
I wonder what happens to this celebrated independent streak of the Indian media when dealing with the conundrum called Kashmir. Except for a few stray, courageous voices, most journalists lose their mojo as they obsequiously toe the official narrative and line of the security state.
While issues of human rights violations and humanitarian suffering elsewhere in the country are promptly and enthusiastically reported and played out a zillion times in 24/7 media, they are swallowed up by a cold silence of indifference and apathy when similar things happen in Kashmir. Worse still, they are portrayed as a grand Pakistan plot to sow seeds of strife in Kashmir and tear it away from the unwilling hands of mother India.
If only Indian journalists were able to see Kashmir not as a territory with a predominantly Muslim majority claimed and obsessed over by Pakistan but as people of flesh and blood like us, would we still be so indifferent and insensitive to their predicament and appalling humanitarian tragedy that is Kashmir?
Between 1989 and 2011 alone there have been more than 8,000 documented disappearances and at least 80,000 Kashmiri deaths. Then there are those thousands of half widows who do not know whether to wait for their missing husbands or mourn them.
In 2011, the State Human Rights Commission of Jammu and Kashmir released a report documenting more than 2,000 unidentified bodies in 30-40 odd mass graves and essentially verified other similar reports from local organisations, most notably the International People’s Tribunal of Human Rights and Justice in Indian-administered Kashmir. DNA testing subsequently confirmed that these bodies belonged to Kashmiris.
And we are not even talking about the hundreds of rapes, staged encounters and daily humiliation that Kashmiris routinely undergo at the hands of security forces at ubiquitous checkpoints.
Even through the off and on ‘dialogue’ that New Delhi held with the Kashmiri separatists, these extrajudicial killings and other methods of persuasion never stopped.
In the presence of draconian laws like the AFSPA, which allows the security forces to get away with murder in conflict zones, what do you expect? Even otherwise, AFSPA or no AFSPA, Kashmir is a special case and ‘occasional violations’ by troops are understandable.
Look at the killing of Burhan Wani, the Hizbul Mujahideen commander, which has sparked the current turmoil in the Valley. Wani, 21, was gunned down with two of his comrades in circumstances that are yet to be explained. Ironically, this happened the day the Supreme Court slammed the abuse of AFSPA by security forces and the practice of ‘fake encounters.’
The court blew apart the concept of immunity for the armed forces saying there was no such thing as “absolute immunity” and that the security forces could be tried by normal criminal courts for “use of unwarranted and excessive force to kill a person even in a disturbed area.”
Wani was barely 16 when he was first apprehended in 2010 along with his friend in Tral and brutally assaulted by the troops. His young brother was subsequently killed by the troops, giving birth to the legend of the man who is now being painted as the poster boy of Kashmir jihad by the media.
Over the past three decades and more, Kashmir has seen thousands of such 16-year-olds who have been pushed over the edge and forced into the welcoming arms of militancy.
Who and what created Burhan Wani? The Burhans of Kashmir are forced to take up arms, not just for what they call ‘azadi’ but also for freedom from fear and daily humiliation at the hands of men in khaki.
Unfortunately, no lessons have been learnt from 2010 when Kashmir was last rocked by violent protests or many such repeated bouts of violence, unrest and mindless killings. It has been a familiar pattern over the years. All it takes is a small incident or provocation, real or imagined, to light the fuse and blow up the powder keg of frustration and all-pervasive anger.
Yet few of us are prepared to listen to the Kashmiri side of the story and understand why so many of them are ready to brave bullets, throwing away lives full of promise.
I wonder if those in authority would at least now heed the historic SC ruling observing that “the rule of law applies even in disturbed areas and even when dealing with the enemy”? Rule of law is daily flouted and mocked at in Kashmir.
To most Indians, especially the neo-rich and upwardly-mobile middle classes and the self-anointed protectors of national interest in the media, Kashmir is an integral and inalienable part of Mother India. Period.
The Kashmiris, their angst and aspirations, long and documented history of a free existence and all the fine promises that were made to them by independent India’s leadership at the time of accession be damned.
It hardly matters what the Kashmiris want even if this has been their homeland. It is we who will decide what they should want and deserve.
As Jhuma Sen argues, “New Delhi has been the self-appointed arbitrator in determining Kashmiri aspirations and claims to freedom.”
And the Indian media and establishment dutifully follow the same unwritten policy, telling Kashmiris ad nauseam what they should want and get. “The policy of denying Kashmiris the right to articulate what they want has been successfully carried forward by Indian media, where a prime time debate on Kashmir after every periodic unrest usually includes everyone but a Kashmiri with the anchor repeatedly thundering: ‘But what do they want?’”
What do you think the Kashmiris – five generations of them since 1931, the year of first revolt against the Maharaja – have been fighting and dying for all these years?
All that the Kashmiris want is the same inalienable right that you and I enjoy and everyone on the planet does, according to the UN Charter. They seek the same dignity and freedom to choose their destiny that we once wanted.
I know this is not something that is palatable to the majority of proud and patriotic Indians, especially under the current dispensation that endlessly dreams of the mythical Akhand Bharat, extending from Afghanistan to Burma.
But Kashmir will continue to bleed and its young will continue to defy the might of the Indian state as long as we do not accept that it is the Kashmiris – and not New Delhi or Islamabad – who are the primary stakeholders in Kashmir and ultimately responsible for their destiny.