Authorities investigate mosque loudspeaker use amid protests; local Muslims defend the practice as vital for prayer timings
NEW DELHI/VARANASI — The debate over use of loudspeakers in mosques has resurfaced with intensity in Varanasi in Uttar Pradesh, days after similar disputes were reported in Maharashtra and other states. Hindu organisations have issued an ultimatum demanding the removal of loudspeakers from mosques within seven days, citing disturbance caused by the high volume of azaan, the call to prayer.
Sudhir Singh, President of the Hanuman Sena, warned, “If loudspeakers are not removed from mosques, we will install large speakers at every home in the city and play the Hanuman Chalisa throughout the day.”
Following this public threat, local authorities began monitoring the Langda Hafiz Mosque in Dalmandi, Varanasi. The investigation revealed that several loudspeakers had already been removed from the mosque in response to previous protests. Members of the Muslim community stated, “The administration had previously asked for loudspeakers to be taken down after protests by Hindu organisations, and now the azaan continues without them. Even without the loudspeakers, it helps us know the correct time for prayers and has many benefits.”
The controversy comes amid nationwide discussions on loudspeaker use for religious purposes. Courts in Mumbai and other states have issued clear guidelines regarding this matter. The Supreme Court has stated that the use of loudspeakers is not an essential part of any religion and all places of worship must comply with noise pollution rules.
According to Supreme Court guidelines, state governments may permit the use of loudspeakers during religious festivals or special occasions for up to 15 days a year, and only until midnight. Violation of these regulations can result in imprisonment or fines, with punishments of up to five years in jail and one year of additional penalties in case of repeated offences.
Local Muslims argue that calls to prayer serve an important function beyond ritual observance. A community member explained, “The azaan is not just a tradition; it signals the correct times for prayers and helps organise our daily lives. Removing it entirely affects our routine and sense of spiritual connection.”
Meanwhile, authorities continue to balance the enforcement of noise regulations with protecting religious freedoms. Officials stated, “Our priority is to ensure compliance with the law while respecting the faith of all communities. We are monitoring the situation closely and acting in accordance with court directives.”
The Varanasi case underscores the ongoing tension between religious expression and legal limits on volume, a debate echoed across India as communities navigate coexistence in diverse urban spaces.
