Reported by IANS
NEW DELHI — Home Minister Rajnath Singh on Thursday said key documents related to the Ishrat Jahan case have gone missing and the government is holding an internal inquiry over the change of affidavit and missing of letters and documents in connection with it.
He also accused the previous Congress-led government of a flip-flop over the controversial 2004 shootout that killed the alleged Lashkar-e-Taiba woman operative.
“Two letters from the then home secretary to the attorney general in 2009 have gone missing. The then attorney general had vetted two affidavits regarding the case. Those are also not available,” Rajnath Singh told the Lok Sabha on Thursday, replying to a brief debate on the controversial June 15, 2004, shootout.
He said that the government has launched an “internal inquiry” to find the missing documents “which will bring all the facts out” in the open.
Without naming Congress leader P. Chidambaram, Rajnath Singh alleged that affidavits regarding the case were corrected on the intervention of the then home minister and reaffirmed that an investigation has found that the Thane girl was a terrorist — a claim also seconded by American-Pakistani terrorist David Coleman Headley in his deposition.
“I am pained to say that there was a flip-flop on Ishrat Jahan case during the previous UPA (United Progressive Alliance) government,” Rajnath Singh said, amid a pandemonium by some opposition members.
“She was described as an LeT terrorist in the first affidavit filed in the Gujarat High Court but unfortunately the facts were given another dimension in an additional affidavit which was filed a month later. It seems an attempt was made to weaken the case.”
The minister also accused the previous government of hatching a conspiracy to malign the then Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi and his government.
“The affidavit was changed to malign the Gujarat government, the then chief minister. A conspiracy was hatched to drag him into the case.”
Rajnath Singh said that government was not relying solely on the testimony of Headley – a Lashkar operative who scouted terror targets before the 2008 Mumbai terror attack.
Headley is currently in a US jail from where he was questioned by an Indian magistrate last month through videoconferencing. The Pakistani-American terrorist said he had heard his LeT handlers talk about a girl in India named Ishrat.
He also accused the opposition party of playing cheap politics over Ishrat Jahan case.
“Headley’s deposition proved that Jahan was a terrorist and this fact was also mentioned in the first affidavit filed in Gujarat High Court,” he said.
The controversy over the case flared up again after Headley made the startling claim on February 11 this year about the 2004 Gujarat shootout — the already murky Ishrat Jahan case has become even murkier.
Rajnath Singh alleged that the previous government had tried to give a political and communal colour to terrorism in India and reminded the Congress of the “saffron terror” label given to describe acts of violence allegedly committed by Hindu nationalists.
“Saffron terror was the previous government’s term. Color, creed and religion are not linked to terrorism. They gave a communal color to terrorism. This is opportunistic secularism.”
He said the whole world was battling “the menace of terrorism” and “there should not be politics over it”.
Earlier, Rajnath Singh said in his statement that the then union government in its seceond affidavit to the High Court did not mention the reason.
“The notings on the concerned file do not provide any reason for filing of the affidavit on September 29, 2009. It has been mentioned in the affidavit that the further affidavit was being made in view of subsequent developments in relation to the issues connected with the petition and to clarify apprehensions expressed in regard to the affidavit filed by government on August 6, 2009, as well as to refute attempts to misinterpret portions of the affidavit.”
Participating in the discussion, BJP member Satyapal Singh, who had once headed the Special Investigation Team, alleged that one of the senior Congress leaders called him and allured if he does as per the desire of then Home Minister. “I got a call from one of the top Congress leaders, who said that home minister has selected you especially for a mission and that mission is to prove the entire case a lie and have to reach up to Gujarat chief minister,” he said.
“I was allured. I told this to then Chief Minister of Maharashtra and his secretary,” he said.
Satyapal Singh also clarified why he left to continue as the chairman of the SIT.
“Neither Congress nor BJP can pressurize me. I thought, whatever report I will submit, I will be targeted. So I made excuses of not knowing Gujarati and left,” he said.
“I even told the home minister that I can’t work under such circumstances,” he added.
Biju Janata Dal (BJD) member Kalikesh Narayan Singh Deo accused both the BJP and the Congress of doing vote bank politics over the case.
“The UPA did vote bank politics and now the present government is doing the same. In all these credibility of IB and CBI was destroyed,” he said.
Terming the Ishrat Jahan shootout as extra judicial killing, the BJD leader said that she was killed in a fake encounter.—IANS