Dr James M. Dorsey
THE jury is out on Iran’s newly appointed supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei.
Judged by his track record, Mr Khamenei’s appointment does not bode well for Iran or a quick end to the war.
Mr Khamenei’s appointment is an act of defiance that signals resilience, regime cohesion, and consistency rather than Iran’s turn to a hereditary system.
His appointment also has religious significance.
Mr Khamenei is the son of a leader viewed by many as a martyr killed by enemy forces, much like Hussein, the son of Ali, the son-in-law of Prophet Mohammed, who died in the Battle of Karbala in 680 CE.
Shia community annually commemorate Hussein’s death as a prime example of resistance against injustice and tyranny.
The killing of Ayatollah Khamenei and US President Donald Trump’s insistence that he would have a say in the appointment of Iran’s next Supreme Leader and warning that Mr Khamenei would be “unacceptable,” reinforced his position as a frontrunner.
Long touted as a potential successor of his father, who was killed in the early hours of the February 28 US-Israeli assault on Iran, Mr Khamenei never held public office but served behind the scenes as Ayatollah Khamenei’s powerful gatekeeper and political broker.
As such, he is likely to quickly consolidate power and assert control of the Islamic Republic’s system.
Many associate Mr Khamenei with the repeated crackdowns on anti-government protests starting with demonstrations in 2009 against an allegedly fraudulent presidential election and, most recently, the brutal repression of protests in January.
Even so, 56-year-old Mr Khamenei is, for all practical purposes, a dark horse who has rarely appeared in public.
While perceived as a hardliner with close ties to Iran’s clerical class and security and military establishment, including the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Mr Khamenei’s appointment marks a generational change in Iran’s most senior leadership.
While loyal to the Islamic Republic, many among Iran’s next generation are perceived to be more pragmatic than Iran’s old guard, represented by Ayatollah Khamenei.
With Iranians and the world waiting with bated breath for Mr Khamenei’s first address to a nation that knows little about him, his initial statements are likely to suggest little, if any, change.
Defiance, resilience, resistance, unity, and consistency will be his motto.
But if the history of the Middle East has any lessons for Iran, it is that hardliners rather than moderates often prove the most credible in embracing compromise.
It was Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the Islamic Republic’s founder, who in 1988 swallowed the “poison” of a ceasefire in the eight-year-long Iran-Iraq war.
Similarly, hardline Israeli Prime Minister Menahem Begin made peace with Egypt, while Yitzhak Rabin and Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) Chairman Yasser Arafat compromised with their acceptance of a two-state solution for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
“If there is anyone who could move toward some sort of de-escalation with the United States, it is him — any other person would face backlash from the ruling class and conservatives. He intends to bring structural change,” said Abdolreza Davari, a politician close to Mr. Khamenei.
That is, if Mr Khamenei survives long enough. He is a man with a target on his back.
Israel has vowed to kill whoever succeeds Ayatollah Khamenei.
As a result, Mr Khamenei’s longevity will be one more litmus test of US and Israeli intelligence penetration of Iran.
_____________
Dr James M. Dorsey is an award-winning journalist and scholar and a Senior Fellow at the National University of Singapore’s Middle East Institute. The views expressed here are author’s own and Clarion India does not necessarily share or subscribe to them. The article originally appeared on redressonline.com.
