US President Donald Trump, on his social media platform Truth Social, reportedly made a provocative statement that he would “erase an entire civilisation” if Iran did not agree to his terms for a deal. The remark revived debate around the idea of a “clash of civilizations,” first articulated by Samuel P. Huntington in his 1993 work The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order.
Huntington argued that future conflicts would be driven not primarily by economic or military factors, but by cultural and religious differences. According to his thesis, civilisational identities would define global fault lines.
In this framework, some analysts interpret contemporary geopolitics as involving major religious-cultural blocs — often citing Judaism (Israel), Christianity (the West, led by the US), and Hinduism (India) —contesting for supremacy against the Islamic civilisation.
Viewed through this lens, the conflict involving Iran is seen by some as reflecting elements of this broader civilisational tension. Iran is often portrayed by its supporters as representing resistance to Western and Israeli influence in the region.
From this perspective, Iran’s ability to withstand military and economic pressure is framed as a symbolic assertion of resilience, with supporters arguing that it reinforces a sense of dignity within parts of the Muslim world.
Historically, the modern Middle East was shaped in the aftermath of World War I (1914–1918), when the Ottoman Empire collapsed and European powers, particularly Britain, redrew regional boundaries. Following World War II, the United States emerged as a dominant power and established a strong presence in the Gulf.
Several Gulf monarchies developed close strategic ties with the US, prioritising security partnerships and economic cooperation. Critics, however, argue that such alignments have come at the cost of political autonomy and regional unity.
Iran’s trajectory diverged significantly. In 1953, Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh was overthrown in a coup widely believed to have been backed by Western powers after he nationalised Iran’s oil industry. The monarchy under Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi followed, until it was overthrown by the Islamic Revolution in 1979.
Since then, Iran has positioned itself in opposition to US and Israeli influence in the region, framing its foreign policy in terms of resistance to what it describes as hegemonic forces.
Iran’s leadership has periodically called for greater unity within the Muslim world, though relations with many Arab states have remained strained. Meanwhile, some Gulf countries have deepened ties with Israel, including through the Abraham Accords signed in 2020.
Tensions escalated into open conflict in late March 2026, when the US and Israel launched military operations against Iran. Iran, in turn, responded with force, leading to a prolonged confrontation that eventually ended in a ceasefire.
Supporters of Iran describe the outcome as a strategic and symbolic success, arguing that it challenged the perceived dominance of more powerful adversaries. The conflict has been likened by some commentators to a “David versus Goliath” scenario, where a smaller power withstands pressure from stronger opponents.
They argue that the ceasefire marked not just a military or economic outcome, but also a shift in narrative — one that questions assumptions about invincibility and power hierarchies.
The conflict has also drawn in wider geopolitical actors. India, for instance, has in recent years strengthened ties with Israel, a shift that some interpret as part of a broader realignment. Critics of this policy argue that it reflects an ideological turn in Indian politics, particularly with the rise of Hindutva.
These developments have fueled debate about whether global politics is increasingly being shaped by civilisational identities, as Huntington suggested, or whether such interpretations oversimplify complex geopolitical realities.
In conclusion, the recent conflict involving Iran has been interpreted by its supporters as a demonstration of resilience across military, economic, and symbolic dimensions. They argue that it has reinforced a sense of dignity and resistance within sections of the Muslim world.
However, whether this marks a decisive moment in a broader “clash of civilisations” remains a matter of perspective — one that continues to be debated across political and academic circles.
___________
Syed Ali Mujtaba is a journalist based in Chennai. He can be contacted at syedalimujtaba2007@gmail.com. The views expressed here are author’s personal and Clarion India does not necessarily subscribe to them.
