Maulana Syed Saif Abbas calls on Jagdambika Pal and presents a list of objections and suggestions
LUCKNOW — Shia leader and President of the Shia Moon Committee, Maulana Syed Saif Abbas Naqvi, held detailed discussions with Jagdambika Pal, Chairman of the Joint Parliamentary Committee on the Waqf Amendment Bill 2024 here on Tuesday. The meeting, held at Pal’s residence, centered around the potential impact of the proposed bill on the Muslim community and the protection of waqf properties.
Pal emphasised the government’s intention to safeguard waqf properties through the proposed amendments. “This bill is designed to protect waqf so that no one can harm it, and it will contribute to the development of Muslims in our country,” Pal stated.
However, Maulana Saif Abbas voiced his concerns regarding several aspects of the bill. He pointed out that the amendment includes changes to 44 key points, many of which he believes are flawed. “There are significant issues in the Waqf Amendment Bill as it stands,” Maulana Saif Abbas remarked. He presented a list of objections and suggestions, prepared by Advocate Muhammad Haider Rizvi’s team, highlighting the need for further consideration of various issues.
During the discussion, Maulana Saif Abbas proposed the creation of a portal by the committee. “A dedicated portal should be established so that scholars, intellectuals, and organisations across the country can submit their suggestions and feedback on the bill,” he suggested.
Maulana Syed Saif Abbas also stressed the importance of involving religious leaders and intellectuals in a comprehensive dialogue with the Joint Parliamentary Committee. “It is crucial that a meeting be arranged between the committee and religious leaders to thoroughly discuss the Waqf Amendment Bill 2024,” he added.
Maulana Saif Abbas specifically drew attention to constitutional concerns, arguing that the amendments in the bill could violate Articles 25, 26, and 30 of the Constitution. “The Waqf Act of 1995 has been amended in ways that infringe upon fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution,” he warned.
The meeting concluded with both parties agreeing on the need for further discussions and consultations to address the concerns raised, ensuring that the bill serves its intended purpose without infringing on constitutional rights.
