Critics warn that repeated targeting of religious sites across Uttarakhand may harm cultural and spiritual heritage of the state
NEW DELHI/ROORKEE — In a controversial move, the Roorkee administration in Uttarakhand, assisted by a large police force, on Wednesday demolished a shrine in Piran Kaliyar, claiming that the land belongs to the Health Department. The operation also included the removal of surrounding encroachments. Officials insist the action was part of an ongoing campaign to reclaim government land and ensure it is utilised as intended.
Local residents expressed shock and sadness over the demolition. “This shrine has been part of our community for generations. It is not just a structure; it is a place of prayer and solace for many families here,” said Abdul Rahman, a long-time resident. “Its removal is an erasure of our history and devotion.”
Authorities maintained that multiple notices had been served prior to the demolition. Haridwar District Magistrate Mayur Dixit stated, “The illegal construction was removed today as per the rules. Strict action will continue against those who illegally occupy government land.” Officials emphasised that the primary aim is to free government property from encroachment and ensure its proper use.
The incident is part of a wider trend across Uttarakhand, where authorities have been conducting operations against illegal religious structures, including shrines and unregistered madrasas. In recent months, similar demolitions have taken place in Dehradun and other districts. While officials argue these steps are necessary for legal compliance, critics warn of growing tensions and the potential impact on the spiritual and cultural life of the Muslim community.
“Repeated demolitions without consultation or provision of alternative spaces risk alienating the community,” noted Fatima Shaheen, a social activist. “People feel their places of worship and cultural heritage are under threat, which can lead to unrest and mistrust towards authorities.”
The Piran Kaliyar shrine had reportedly stood for decades and served as a focal point for local Muslims, especially during religious gatherings. Residents lamented that no efforts were made to explore compromise or relocation before the bulldozers moved in.
While the administration insists the action was legal, Muslim leaders argue for a more sensitive approach, balancing government regulations with the protection of religious and cultural sites. “We are not against law enforcement, but the faith and practices of millions should not be bulldozed away,” said Maulana Asif Qadri, a local cleric.
The situation highlights an ongoing debate in Uttarakhand between government enforcement of land rules and the preservation of religious heritage, particularly for minority communities. Local observers stress that sustained dialogue and planning are essential to prevent further alienation of the Muslim population while addressing concerns about illegal encroachments.
