Action follows high court’s rejection of Muslim Jamaat Trust petition, sparking unrest
Team Clarion
AHMEDABAD – In a controversial move, the Gujarat administration has demolished 12 religious buildings in Balapur village, located in the Bet Dwarka area. The structures, which include mosques, shrines, and a graveyard, were razed by bulldozers in a major operation on Tuesday (February 4). The administration declared the buildings illegal, calling them encroachments on public land.
The action followed the dismissal of a petition filed by the Bet Bhadila Muslim Jamaat Trust in the Gujarat High Court. The petition sought to establish that these religious buildings were the property of the Waqf Board, a body that oversees Muslim religious properties. The court, however, rejected the petition, allowing the administration to proceed with the demolition.
“The buildings in question are of great emotional significance to the local Muslim community,” the petition argued, describing the structures as integral to the faith and identity of the people. It went on to claim that the notices issued for their removal were illegal and unjustified.
The demolition has led to widespread protests and unrest in the region, with many Muslims voicing their concerns over the destruction of their religious sites. “These are not just buildings; they are part of our heritage, our history, and our hearts,” said Imran Sheikh, a local and member of the Muslim community in Bet Dwarka. “The government’s actions have caused immense distress and disappointment.”
This operation is part of a broader anti-encroachment initiative by the Bhupinder Patel-led state government, which has been removing illegal constructions across Gujarat. The Home Minister of Gujarat, Harsh Singhvi, praised the success of the operation, posting on social media: “The seven islands of Dwarka are now 100% encroachment-free. Thirty-six illegal buildings have been removed, helping to preserve our cultural heritage.”
However, the demolitions have raised serious questions about religious sensitivity and the protection of minority rights. Critics argue that the removal of religious sites without providing alternative solutions for the affected communities is an act of injustice. “This is a violation of our rights to practice our religion freely,” said Bilal Khan, another resident. “We urge the government to respect our heritage and reconsider their actions.”
As protests continue in the region, it remains unclear whether the Muslim community will take further legal action. The demolition of these sacred sites has sparked a broader debate about religious freedom, heritage preservation, and the balance between urban development and minority rights in Gujarat.
The situation remains tense as both sides dig in their heels, and many are calling for dialogue and a peaceful resolution to the crisis.
