Delhi Police Pressured Not to Arrest Kapil Mishra: NYT Report

The top echelons of the police force stopped lower officials from taking action against Mishra, says NYT report quoting police official.

“Some officers had wanted to act against Mishra, but that they were pressured by the force’s leadership not to touch “the warriors of the government.”

Clarion India

NEW DELHI — A report published by The New York Times on Sunday said that Delhi police officers are under pressure to not arrest the controversial Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Kapil Mishra accused of instigating anti-Muslim riots in Delhi in late February.

Citing an unnamed Superintendent of Police, the report said the top echelons of the police force stopped lower officials from taking action against Mishra. “Some officers had wanted to act against Mishra, but that they were pressured by the force’s leadership not to touch “the warriors of the government.”

“We did not even try,” the superintendent said. “The directions were clear: Don’t lay your hands on him.”

At least 53 people were killed, most of them Muslims, during the riots that shook parts of North-East Delhi in late February after Mishra gave provocative speeches instigating the crowds against people who were on roads for months protesting the Citizenship Amendment Act, which critics say discriminates against Muslims.

Mosques and homes of Muslims were set afire in the bloody violence. There were also cases of violence against Hindus in some places, leaving nearly a dozen Hindus dead.

The NYT report titled ‘India Rounds Up Critics Under Shadow of Virus Crisis, Activists Say’ claims that the government, under the cover of coronavirus lockdown was going after those who opposed the “iron-fisted and anti-minority policies” of the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

According to the report, the rights groups have said that the police were detaining activists and ordinary Muslims arbitrarily based on scant evidence but have denied accusations of impropriety. “It is very important that the police force remain impartial,” said the police chief in New Delhi. “And we are following this principle from Day 1.”

Reports have suggested that the police have “detained about 1,300 people for involvement in the protests and riots, including an equal number of Hindus and Muslims.” But lawyers have accused the police of withholding the information about the arrests.

According the report, a judge hearing a case against a Muslim protester wrote that the police appeared to be targeting only “one end” without probing the “rival faction.” During the riots, the police were accused of abetting Hindus and, in some cases, torturing Muslims. The torture of Khalid Saifi, an incarcerated rights activist who works with United against Hate group, was reported in the media after his wheelchair-bound image went viral.

Last week, the Delhi Minorities Commission, a government body, released a report accusing the police of siding with the mobs in the anti-Muslim violence. It blamed BJP leaders for instigating the riots through fiery speeches during and after local elections.

Also read: 


  1. So It is not the same India n same police forces we use to see some years before. India is famous for being a coutry of democracy where one can have equal rights and equal right to speak. Alas with this report I feel my self being ruled by a NAZI government where cases are heard selectively on religion based. The situation if continued futher will deterioate the Indian ethics n culture of being treated as one with same rod n scale. It is still time for Indians to judiciously use votes while choosing a candidate fir any particular party. Intellectualls in India seem to have been silenced n electronic media plays role like chief of the justice. I feel ashamed when anchors say Nation wants to know, a d It is the media that runs the govt n govt runs the media. Where muslims n Sikhs stand in the country? Is anyone from the govt to hear to their miseries or the selective torture by police…perhaps none other than the God. Nobody dared to talk about muslim lynchings during broaday light in India not to talk about justice. Hope my piece of expression find a space in any newspaper no matter about the outcome of implications for soeaking out heart n reality.

  2. Can Audible Work?
    To begin with, you get a complimentary audiobook and take
    a free trial of Audible out. This really is among perhaps an originals or the classics.

    At the conclusion of your trial, you can purchase a subscription of Audible.
    You will need to sign up for the membership.

    You are awarded by Audible with a single credit Monthly.
    It is possible to use this credit to buy Audible
    audio books in various categories including technology, fashion, love, social networking,
    ads, etc..
    You can buy more Audible credits or pay-per audio
    publication if you want to buy more books.
    A member may download just a couple of six Audible Originals.

    They don’t cost any credits. These Audible Originals can be kept by you .

    You have Audible books in your library in case you cancel your subscription.
    You can listen to Audible books anyplace using apps for Windows,
    your telephone or Mac computer or Alexa device.|

    With over 300,000 titles to its name, Audible is the world’s biggest vendor and manufacturer of audiobooks.

    Audible Review


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here