The release of documents by the Turkish government has cleared the dust that had settled over Hagia Sophia. All those who joined the chorus of Clash of Civilization have to shut their mouths, including those in India
Syed Ali Mujtaba | Clarion India
Turkey has come out with an official clarification to those protesting against its government’s decision to convert Hagia Sophia, the world-famous monument, into a mosque in Istanbul.
Hagia Sophia was built as a Church under Byzantine rulers in 537 AD. It was converted into Great Mosque of Ayasofya in 1453 when Ottomans conquered Turkey. In 1931, Turkish nationalist leader Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, first President, converted the marvelous structure into a secular museum.
In a recent development, Turkey’s current President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has passed an order to revert the Hagia Sofia into a Great Mosque of Ayasofya. The first prayers in this grand mosque will be held on July 24 after almost 85 years.
The decision of the Turkish government has turned heads worldwide, more so in the Christian world that pointed fingers at President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan taking Turkey to the medieval age.
Critics called this move of the Turkish President as clash of civilization between Islam and Christianity. This controversy has echoes in India, with Hindu radicals holding the tail coat of the Christian protestors. The Hindutva radicals join the hurt feelings of the Christians in this clash Civilization as it fits into the political design of anti-Muslim, anti-Islam project that is currently under way as a “Lok Abhiyan” in India.
Some apologists refuse to see it as an internal matter of Turkey and have jumped into the Clash-of-Civilization debate and equate the development of conversion of the Hagia Sofia museum into Ayasofya Mosque in Istanbul with the conversion of Babri Mosque into Ram temple in Ayodhya.
There are some who try to read the conversion of the Hagia Sophia museum into a mosque by President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan as an attempt to replicate the “Jai Sri Ram Model” of India to remain in power in Turkey.
Putting an end to the dominant narrative on Hagia Sophia, the Turkish Foreign Minister L Abu Bakr has issued a press note on the subject which is an eye-opener to the world and also to the judicial and political elite of India, who colluded to deny Muslims their rightful ownership of their house of worship.
Turkish Foreign Minister L Abu Bakr has claimed that Sultan Muhammad II, also known as Muhammad Al-Fateh, after opening the gates of Constantinople (Istanbul), offered the Pastor of Church Hagia Sophia to buy the building as an individual purchaser of the said property.
The Turkish Foreign Minister L Abu Bakr released the sale deed or purchase contract with the photos and copies of documents associated with it. The Turkish government manually reviewed 27,000 documents and found the original title deed (Tabou) that exists in the name of buyer Abu Al- Fateh, also known as Sultan Muhammad II.
The copy of the sale deed document that was executed at that time was released by the Turkish Minister. It stated that the buyer Abu Al-Fateh has bought this property through his own money.
The sale deed says that Abu Al-Fateh has purchased this property through its own hard-earned money and is pure of any evil or vice source of earnings. The sale deed mentions that this money is not taken from the State treasury or from common Muslim funding and his private source of income.
The Minister mentions that this sale deed was documented through a purchase-and-waiver contract, and payment was made through payment bonds. The document clearly proves that Hagia Sophia is a private property with the ownership in the name of Abul Al- Fateh, the Minister said.
He claimed that there exists an endowment in the name of Sultan Muhammad II that is related to ‘Ayasofya.’ The landlord of the property of Hagia Sophia created an endowment and willed that the building be made a mosque and the people of Islamic faith can use it as a house of worship.
The Minister said these documents are in public domain now and anyone can go through these papers before attacking the Turkish government’s move to reconvert the Hagia Sophia museum as a Great Mosque of Ayasofya.
The Minister, however, was silent about the role of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk in converting the Great Mosque of Ayasofya into a museum. Mustafa Kemal Atatürk laid the foundation of the Turkish Republic in 1923 and he initiated rigorous reforms that transformed Turkey into a modern, progressive and secular nation-state.
The release of documents by the Turkish government has cleared the dust that had settled over Hagia Sophia. All those who joined the chorus of Clash of Civilization have to shut their mouths, including those in India.
The disclosures of the Turkish Minister has held mirror up to those equating Hagia Sophia with the Babri Mosque’s conversion into Ram temple in Ayodhya. These two are separate matters and cannot be compared but have some food for thought for all.
Babri Masjid was built in 1528 by one Mir Baqi on a land duly purchased by him from his hard-earned money, free from any vice or evil means of earnings. Baqi named the mosque as “Babri Masjid” after the ruler of the day.
The Supreme Court pronounced its judgment in Babri Masjid vs Ram Janambohmi case 2019. The court has admitted that Mir Baqi constructed the Babri mosque in 1528. He did not do it by demolishing any Hindu temple.
The Supreme Court admits that prayers were held in the Babri mosque till 1948. The court also said that the installation of the idol in the Babri mosque in 1948 was unlawful. The court also called the demolition of the Babri Masjid on 6th December 1992 as illegal.
In spite of all these admissions, the Supreme Court ruled that the disputed property belongs to Hindu claimants because the Muslim party has not sufficiently established its claim.
The apex court of India while giving the disputed site to the Hindu party asked the government to constitute a board that can proceed with the construction of the Ram temple where Babri Masjid stood for nearly 500 years.
However, the court did not give the same instruction to the government to constitute a board for the Muslim party to construct a mosque. It simply asked the government to allocate 5 acres of land elsewhere where Muslims can construct a mosque.
This judgment favoring the majority community though defused the highly-charged communal atmosphere of the country but left the Muslim minority in despair. Many felt it was a travesty of justice but accepted the judgment as a fait accompli for being born in India.
So there is no comparison between Hagia Sophia and Babri Masjid. A mosque is a house of Allah if that is built with due procedure of the Islamic faith and Babri masjid will be remembered as a mosque with a black judgment that has made it a Ram temple.
Syed Ali Mujtaba is a journalist based in Chennai. He can be contacted at [email protected]
