Home BIG STORY Babri Masjid Demolition: How a Wrong Was Conveniently Turned into a Right

Babri Masjid Demolition: How a Wrong Was Conveniently Turned into a Right

Babri Masjid Demolition: How a Wrong Was Conveniently Turned into a Right

Abu Anam | Clarion India

NEW DELHI — On this day exactly 31 years ago, a huge number of rowdy and unruly Hindutva proponents sowed the seeds of an unholy exercise of blatantly converting a wrong into a right.

Memories of that fateful day of December 6 of 1992, when the dastardly demolition of Babri Masjid in Ayodhya was carried out under the direct supervision of the entire state structure — the police, the army, the government and all the opposition parties, are still painfully etched in the minds of the Muslims of the country. The community is also watching in dismay and despair the oddest spectacle of all and sundry leaders of secular political parties openly expressing their happiness and merriment on the construction of the Ram temple on the ruins of the masjid and, of course, India’s secularism and democratic pillar we have always been proud of. These leaders are leaving no opportunity to congratulate the Hindus for the temple, purely for political gains as their parties have miserably failed in checking the Hindutva juggernaut of the BJP-RSS saffron bogey.

Muslims have suffered and have been suffering a lot since that shameful day when the secular fabric of the country was torn apart. Secularism and inclusiveness of all faiths have been the foundations promised by the architects of our Constitution. But all these characteristics, so assiduously nurtured by our forefathers, were made to bite the dust by the chariot L.K. Advani rode across the country.

In the immediate aftermath of the destruction of the Ayodhya mosque, over 2,000 Muslims were killed in violence perpetuated by the kar sewaks across the country.

It is not that there are no non-Muslims who are equally anguished over the daylight murder of secularism in India. Aakash Joshi writing in The Indian Express said: “There is a simple question which — for those who are lucky enough with parents, teachers, friends and role models — we are taught to ask ourselves as children. What is the difference between right and wrong? As time goes on, the answers become mired in complexity — of life and relationships, politics and justice. People begin to understand that right and wrong are not binaries and that wrongs can be made right. Or can they?

“On December 6, 1992 — 31 years to the day — a large group of people demolished a “disputed structure”. The Babri Masjid, and whether a temple preceded the mosque on the site, was already a fraught matter that had challenged the Indian judiciary and political class for decades. The people who demolished it did so on the backs of a chariot that traversed large parts of the country. Many, if not most of them, claimed allegiance to the same political ideology that rules India today. The legal machinery issued a settlement order — the matter went to the highest court in the land — under which a temple is now being constructed where the mosque once stood.

This temple is the pride of the current government and ruling party. It has been a major plank of its campaigns in election after election, including the ones that led to its massive victories in Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Chattisgarh just days ago. The people of (North) India seem to have expressed their support, once again, for a worldview that imagines an oppressed majority and an oppressor minority, despite evidence to the contrary. At the very least, “the people” do not consider the demolition a blot and many probably vote for the ruling party because of its consequences. The justice system, for its part, maintains that the destruction was criminal. Yet, no one is jailed for it, no one is responsible.”

Mathew John, a former civil servant, says the Babri Masjid demolition was a “frontal assault on our collective identity as a secular nation. More than anything else, it demonstrated the power of the ethnocentric Hindutva ideology that upholds the supremacy of Hindus and purveys a pathological animosity toward Muslims and Christians. This doctrine of Hindu exclusiveness has become a more than formidable alternative to the secular principle of pluralism and inclusion enunciated in the Constitution.
Writing for The Wire, John said the events of December 6, 1992 have stimulated a second partition of the country, albeit metaphorical in the sense that it is not a physical territorial split but a schismatic division of minds based on religion. “From the day of the Babri Masjid destruction, the Hindutva credo of majoritarian nationalism has been in deadly political and social combat with the idea of India envisaged by our founding fathers,” he wrote.

How the judges, who delivered the infamous verdict of granting the masjid site to the Hindus after acknowledging that the structure’s destruction was wrong, idols were surreptitiously placed in the masjid, and there was a criminal conspiracy for razing the masjid, were duly rewarded is not a matter of conjecture anymore.

Thus, the Hindutva conspiracy of transforming an overt and shameful wrong into an unpronounced right was accomplished. Damn the Muslims, the so-called Hindu nationalists are happy with the 80-20 formulation at the hustings.

Opinions and views expressed in columns and blogs and comments by readers are those of individual writers and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Clarion India.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here