The move is a reflection of a narrow, exclusionary ideology that seeks to polarise society and undermine India's secular fabric
NEW DELHI — The Vishva Hindu Parishad’s (VHP) recent proposal to rename Delhi to “Indraprastha” has sparked intense debate and criticism from historians and activists. According to the VHP, the name change is an attempt to reclaim the city’s ancient heritage and associate it with the mythological city of Indraprastha mentioned in the Mahabharata.
However, critics argue that this move is a blatant attempt to erase Delhi’s rich cultural and historical legacy, which is a blend of Hindu, Muslim, and other influences.
Historians point out that Delhi’s name is derived from the Tomara king, Dhillu, who founded the city in the 8th century BC. Renaming the city would not only erase its historical identity but also undermine the contributions of various rulers and cultures that have shaped the city’s architecture, art, and literature over the centuries.
Activists also argue that such moves are a reflection of a narrow, exclusionary ideology that seeks to polarise society and undermine India’s secular fabric.
In a letter to Delhi’s Culture Minister Kapil Mishra, the VHP submitted the formal proposal to rename the capital ‘Indraprastha.’ It also calls for renaming key landmarks and integrating Pandava-era heritage into education and tourism.
Surendra Kumar Gupta, Secretary of VHP’s Delhi unit, emphasised that names carry cultural significance. “Delhi reflects a 2,000-year history, but Indraprastha evokes a 5,000-year-old legacy tied to our epic traditions,” Gupta said. The VHP suggests renaming:
Indira Gandhi International Airport to Indraprastha International Airport.
Delhi Railway Station to Indraprastha Railway Station.
Shahjahanabad Development Board to Indraprastha Development Board.
Additionally, the VHP advocates enhancing Delhi’s heritage walks to highlight forts, temples, and sites linked to Hindu rulers, alongside existing Mughal and colonial landmarks. The group also proposes incorporating the history of King Hemchandra Vikramaditya and the Indraprastha era into school curricula to educate younger generations about their ancient heritage.
Critics of the proposal caution against selective historical narratives. Dr Ananya Sharma, a historian at Delhi University, noted, “Delhi’s identity spans Hindu, Mughal, and colonial eras. Renaming risks sidelining this diversity.”
Education experts also stressed that curricula should present a balanced view, acknowledging all cultural influences without prioritising one over others. Urban heritage specialists also expressed concerns about altering established names.
“Renaming landmarks like Shahjahanabad could disrupt historical continuity and public memory,” said Ritu Mehra, an urban planner. She advocated for inclusive heritage preservation that reflects Delhi’s multifaceted history.
The VHP’s call aligns with a broader trend in the country, where renaming cities and institutions—such as Allahabad to Prayagraj—has stirred debates over national identity and inclusivity.
As Delhi navigates this proposal, the debate underscores the challenge of balancing historical reverence with modern inclusivity. The outcome could shape how India’s capital represents its diverse past to residents, visitors, and future generations.
