The Congress lawmaker asks critical questions about documentation for citizens lacking ancestral records, highlights implications for vulnerable groups
NEW DELHI – Congress MP Imran Masood on Tuesday raised pointed questions regarding the Supreme Court’s recent ruling that the Aadhaar card cannot serve as proof of Indian citizenship. The court, in its observations on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Bihar’s voter list, recognised Aadhaar as a valid identity document among 12 other accepted proofs but clarified that it establishes only residence, not citizenship.
Reacting to the observations, Masood expressed concern for citizens who may lack official documents. “If the Aadhaar card is not considered proof of citizenship, then what is?” he asked. “What will happen to those whose ancestors’ documents are unavailable? Will they be considered foreigners?”
The Supreme Court’s observation was made by Justice Suryakant during hearings on a petition filed by activist Yogendra Yadav. Justice Suryakant noted that while the Election Commission can verify the authenticity of Aadhaar, it cannot be used to certify citizenship.
Masood’s comments come amidst a wider discourse on documentation and voter rights in India. “We must ensure that no citizen is disenfranchised due to a lack of ancestral records or other documents,” he emphasised.
The Congress MP’s remarks underline concerns over the practical implications of the Supreme Court’s ruling, particularly for citizens without documentation from previous generations. His statements also reflect ongoing debates about democratic processes, governance, and regional political stability.
“Every citizen deserves recognition and protection, irrespective of their documentation,” Masood concluded, stressing the importance of inclusive and fair policies in maintaining democratic integrity.
